Alex focuses his practice on patent litigation. Alex earned his J.D. from Texas A&M University School of Law, where he graduated in the top 2% of his class and then went on to become the top scorer on the July 2022 Texas Bar Exam.

Prior to law school, Alex received a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Oklahoma. During his academic years, Alex worked on IP issues for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. In addition, he served as a judicial intern for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

  • Defending leading dermatology pharmaceutical company in intellectual property case seeking $200 million; obtained summary judgment in favor of clients on damages, noninfringement on all asserted patents and no misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Representing electric-vehicle company in multi-million-dollar litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, and unfair competition
  • Defending hoverboard manufacturer in case alleging infringement of utility and design patents
  • Defending automobile manufacturer in patent litigation
  • Defended all claims of a patent in post-grant review, obtaining reversal of institution decision
  • Representing plaintiffs in district court and appellate proceedings involving claims of defamation and trade libel
  • Representing electric-vehicle company in appellate proceedings related to denial of motion to compel arbitration

Press Releases

18 Munck Wilson Mandala Lawyers Named 2025 Ones to Watch List

Munck Wilson Mandala is pleased to announce that 18 lawyers have been included in the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, a publication that recognizes up-and-coming attorneys for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice. The majority of the MWM attorneys featured on this year’s list have been named to the list previously

| 2 minute read

In the News

Munck Wilson Mandala Achieves Substantial Win in a Trade Secret/Patent Infringement Case

In the end, in two orders entered one-year apart, Judge Gregory Williams granted summary judgment in favor of Galderma on all claims: no patent infringement, no theft of trade secrets, no breach of contract, no misappropriation of trade dress, no damages, and no violations of the Delaware DTPA or California unfair competition laws. This outstanding

| less than a minute

Texas A&M School of Law, JD, 2022

summa cum laude

University of Oklahoma, BS, 2019

Chemical Engineering

  • Registered U.S. Patent Attorney

  • Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch
    2025
  • Top Scorer in the July 2022 Texas Bar Exam

Texas, 2022

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office